Examining negative voting as a possible behavioral consequence of affective polarization and negative partisanship, this study sheds light on the electoral implications of increasingly antagonistic attitudes among the electorate.

Chapter 1: Introduction.- Chapter 2: Negative Voting: A Brief Literature Review.- Chapter 3: Measuring Negative Voting in Democratic Elections.- Chapter 4: The Negative Voting Dataset: 2020-2022.- Chapter 5: The Socio-demographic Profile of Negative Voters.- Chapter 6: Anti-incumbency and Negative Voting.- Chapter 7: Partisanship, Ideology, and Negative Voting.- Chapter 8: Media Usage and Negative Voting.- Chapter 9: In-group Affect, Out-group Distain, and Negative Voting.- Chapter 10: Negative Voting and Affective Polarization.- Chapter 11: The Normative Implications of Negative Voting.- Chapter 12: Conclusions.

In Negative Voting in Comparative Perspective, Diego Garzia and Frederico Ferreira da Silva uncover a common theme—comparative party and candidate evaluations drive negative voting. The authors’ findings have important implications for election outcomes, for mass-elite linkages, and for the climate of political hostility and distrust evident in many contemporary Western publics. 

---James Adams, University of California at Davis 

Negative Voting in Comparative Perspective is an insightful conceptualization and exploration of a vital aspect of democracy. By delving into the intricacies of negative voting, this book equips readers with a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that underpin electoral choices and the accountability of elected officials. This book is a valuable addition to the literature, providing a nuanced and enlightening perspective on the democratic process.

---Carolina Plescia, University of Vienna

Why do some people conceive their vote choices as mostly against, rather than for a given party/candidate? Who are these negative voters? What macro-level conditions favor the development of negative voting? This volume provides answers to these questions through the first comparative assessment of negative voting in contemporary democracies. It presents a composite theoretical framework for the analysis of negative voting and tests it extensively on originally collected survey data from Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. Examining negative voting as a possible behavioral consequence of affective polarization and negative partisanship, this study sheds light on the electoral implications of increasingly antagonistic attitudes among the electorate.

Diego Garzia is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Lausanne, and also a recurring Visiting Fellow at the European University Institute in Fiesole. He currently serves as a member of the Scientific Committee of the Italian National Election Study (ITANES). With Palgrave Macmillan, he authored Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change in 2014.

Frederico Ferreira da Silva is a Senior Researcher at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland. He received a Ph.D. in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute. His research on elections, public opinion and voting behavior has been published in numerous academic journals and monographs.

the first comparative account of negative voting in Western democracies to date Advances a theoretical model of negative voting Offers evidence that negative voting is linked to voters’ (affectively polarized) evaluations of candidates