Produktdetaljer
Biographical note
Perry Anderson taught History at UCLA for thirty years and is an Editor at New Left Review. His recent books include The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci and The H-Word.Perry Anderson's <i>Ever Closer Union? </i>provides an elegantly savage critique of the European Union. Many of the arguments and themes may be familiar - years of rowing over Brexit will do that to an audience - but few deliver the lines with the poise of Anderson. What ultimately emerges from the pages of <i>Ever Closer Union?</i> is the EU not as its defenders imagine it to be, but as it really is: an oligarchic institution, built over and against the peoples of Europe.
- Tim Black, Spiked
Anderson's latest book draws on his characteristic method of meticulous and staggering range of reference...His style, with its combative strain, can never be accused of being 'dull, technical, infested with jargon' - faults he ascribes to much literature on the European Union.
- Gordon Parsons, Morning Star
Picking up where his previous study of the European Union, <i>The New Old World</i> (2009), ended, <i>Ever Closer Union?</i> is one of the most serious and intelligent challenges to the EU available.
- Hugo Drochon, Times Literary Supplement
Perry Anderson's critical analysis of the European Union is a devastating indictment of liberal complacency.
- David Jamieson, Jacobin
An incisive and challenging critique of the European integration process. The book could be read for one eye-opening section alone. Witty, aphoristic and cogent
European Political Science
Against the self-image of the bloc, Perry Anderson poses the historical record of its assembly. He traces the wider arc of European history, from First World War to Eurozone crisis, the hegemony of Versailles to that of Maastricht, and casts the work of the EU's leading contemporary analysts - both independent critics and court philosophers - in older traditions of political thought. Are there likenesses to the age of Metternich, lessons in statecraft from that of Machiavelli?
An excursus on the UK's jarring departure from the Union considers the responses it has met with inside the country's intelligentsia, from the contrite to the incandescent. How do Brussels and Westminster compare as constitutional forms? Differently put, which could be said to be worse?