/

Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law Essays for Mark Tushnet

Innbundet / 2025 / Engelsk

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780198891451
Publisert
2025
Utgiver
Vendor
Oxford University Press
Vekt
848 gr
Høyde
241 mm
Bredde
165 mm
Dybde
32 mm
Aldersnivå
UP, 05
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
464

Volume editor
Khosla Madhav
Jackson Vicki C.

Biographical note

Madhav Khosla is an Associate Professor of Law at Columbia University. He is interested in the nature and form of constitutions, especially from a comparative and theoretical perspective. Khosla studied political theory at Harvard University, and law at Yale Law School and the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Before joining Columbia Law School, he was a Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows. Khosla's books include India's Founding Moment, which was an Economist Best Book of 2020 and co-winner of the Order of the Coif Book Award 2021. Vicki C. Jackson, Laurence H. Tribe Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, works on comparative constitutional law, U.S. constitutional law, and federal courts. Previously she was Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University. She is the author of Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (2010), coauthor, with Mark Tushnet, of Comparative Constitutional Law (3d ed. 2014), and co-editor, with Yasmin Dawood, of Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? (2022), among other works. Her scholarship concerns knowledge institutions, effective government and constitutionalism; judicial independence and the Supreme Court, free expression, federalism, pro-constitutional representation, proportionality review, equality, unconstitutional amendments, and standing.

Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law Essays for Mark Tushnet

Innbundet / 2025 / Engelsk
Innbundet / 2025 / Engelsk
Nettpris:
1.618,-
Laveste pris siste 30 dager: 1.616,-
Levering 7-20 dager
Klikk og hent
Over the past two decades, the field of comparative constitutional law has emerged as a major domain of scholarly inquiry. It has also been a notable feature in judicial practice. Many of the world's leading courts are now composed of at least some members who engage with comparative materials, and thinking comparatively has developed into one of the most significant ways of engaging in constitutional analyses. Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet reflects upon the field of comparative constitutional law. Among the most prominent figures in the development of the field in its ongoing renaissance has been Mark Tushnet. This book uses the occasion of Professor Tushnet's recent retirement from Harvard Law School to think critically about the field. Each essay takes up one of Professor Tushnet's major recent themes which focuses on variations within liberal constitutionalism and the possibility of other forms of constitutionalism that find articulation under other political regimes. In this book, leading scholars contribute to the debate over the nature of the field, including the role of empiricism and language; discussions of democracy and entrenchment; analyses of rights and courts; consideration of constitutional design; and explorations of the extent to which there are varieties of constitutionalism. At a moment of renewed stress and political debate over the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism, Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet offers timely insights into comparative analyses of constitutional rights. Academics and students alike will benefit from the essays that range across both methodological questions and substantive analysis in the development of constitutions throughout the globe.
Les mer
Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet commemorates the writings of Mark Tushnet, a significant voice in the study of comparative constitutional law. Each essay is written by a leading scholar and discusses timely topics such as empiricism and language, democracy and entrenchment, and analyses of rights and courts.
Les mer
1: Rosalind Dixon: How to Compare Constitutionally: An Essay in Honor of Mark Tushnet 2: Ran Hirschl: Comparative Constitutional Law: Reflections on a Field Transformed 3: Tom Ginsburg and Mila Versteeg: Are Constitutions So Indeterminate that We Cannot Compare Them? 4: Sanford Levinson: Mark Tushnet's Central Contribution-and Challenge-to the Enterprise of Comparative Constitutionalism 5: David S. Law: Canon and Comparative Constitutional Law 6: Kim Lane Scheppele: Foxes, Hedgehogs, and Ants 7: Maartje De Visser: Constitutional Comparisons and Language 8: Frank I. Michelman: Reasonable Disagreement: Mark Tushnet, John Rawls, and a Democratic Point to Constitutionalism 9: Pratap Bhanu Mehta: The Challenge to Liberal Constitutionalism 10: Peter Cane: The Architecture of Constitutionalism 11: Richard Albert: Global Values in National Constitutions 12: Aharon Barak: The Constituent Power and Its Limits 13: Cheryl Saunders: Toward Deeper Dialogue: Constitutional and International Law 14: David Landau: Ancillary Powers of Constitution-Making Bodies 15: Dieter Grimm: Legal Reasoning Matters 16: Catherine O'Regan: The Political Paradox of African Constitutionalism Revisited: Kenya's BBI Case 17: Jeremy Waldron: Rights as the Domain of Weak-Form Review 18: David C. Donald: Common Law and the Liberation of Self-Interest from Regulation 19: Po Jen Yap: Dialogic Judicial Review and First World Autocracies 20: Yaniv Roznai: We the Fourth Branch? The People as an Institution Protecting Democracy 21: Sujit Choudhry: Constitutional Design and Political Parties 22: Vicki C. Jackson: Civic Virtue, Civic Obligation, Knowledge Institutions, and Proconstitutional Actors 23: Bojan BugariÄ: Popular Constitutionalism during Populist Times 24: Cora Chan: Pluralizing Constitutionalism 25: Madhav Khosla: Competitive Populism 26: Erin F. Delaney: Mapping Power Constitutionalism and Its Colonial Legacy 27: Jamal Greene: The Possibilities of Constitutional Tourism 28: Mark Tushnet: Constituent Power in Constitutional Theory, with a Note on Language and Method
Les mer
Madhav Khosla is an Associate Professor of Law at Columbia University. He is interested in the nature and form of constitutions, especially from a comparative and theoretical perspective. Khosla studied political theory at Harvard University, and law at Yale Law School and the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Before joining Columbia Law School, he was a Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows. Khosla's books include India's Founding Moment, which was an Economist Best Book of 2020 and co-winner of the Order of the Coif Book Award 2021. Vicki C. Jackson, Laurence H. Tribe Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, works on comparative constitutional law, U.S. constitutional law, and federal courts. Previously she was Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University. She is the author of Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (2010), coauthor, with Mark Tushnet, of Comparative Constitutional Law (3d ed. 2014), and co-editor, with Yasmin Dawood, of Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? (2022), among other works. Her scholarship concerns knowledge institutions, effective government and constitutionalism; judicial independence and the Supreme Court, free expression, federalism, pro-constitutional representation, proportionality review, equality, unconstitutional amendments, and standing.
Les mer
Provides thorough analysis of the field of comparative constitutional law at a moment of renewed stress and political debate over the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism Examines central questions in global constitutionalism through engagement with the work of Professor Mark Tushnet, whose writings have helped define the study of comparative constitutionalism across a range of subjects and countries for decades Contains essays by the field's leading scholars across jurisdictions
Les mer

Relaterte produkter

Over the past two decades, the field of comparative constitutional law has emerged as a major domain of scholarly inquiry. It has also been a notable feature in judicial practice. Many of the world's leading courts are now composed of at least some members who engage with comparative materials, and thinking comparatively has developed into one of the most significant ways of engaging in constitutional analyses. Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet reflects upon the field of comparative constitutional law. Among the most prominent figures in the development of the field in its ongoing renaissance has been Mark Tushnet. This book uses the occasion of Professor Tushnet's recent retirement from Harvard Law School to think critically about the field. Each essay takes up one of Professor Tushnet's major recent themes which focuses on variations within liberal constitutionalism and the possibility of other forms of constitutionalism that find articulation under other political regimes. In this book, leading scholars contribute to the debate over the nature of the field, including the role of empiricism and language; discussions of democracy and entrenchment; analyses of rights and courts; consideration of constitutional design; and explorations of the extent to which there are varieties of constitutionalism. At a moment of renewed stress and political debate over the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism, Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet offers timely insights into comparative analyses of constitutional rights. Academics and students alike will benefit from the essays that range across both methodological questions and substantive analysis in the development of constitutions throughout the globe.
Les mer
Redefining Comparative Constitutional Law: Essays for Mark Tushnet commemorates the writings of Mark Tushnet, a significant voice in the study of comparative constitutional law. Each essay is written by a leading scholar and discusses timely topics such as empiricism and language, democracy and entrenchment, and analyses of rights and courts.
Les mer
1: Rosalind Dixon: How to Compare Constitutionally: An Essay in Honor of Mark Tushnet 2: Ran Hirschl: Comparative Constitutional Law: Reflections on a Field Transformed 3: Tom Ginsburg and Mila Versteeg: Are Constitutions So Indeterminate that We Cannot Compare Them? 4: Sanford Levinson: Mark Tushnet's Central Contribution-and Challenge-to the Enterprise of Comparative Constitutionalism 5: David S. Law: Canon and Comparative Constitutional Law 6: Kim Lane Scheppele: Foxes, Hedgehogs, and Ants 7: Maartje De Visser: Constitutional Comparisons and Language 8: Frank I. Michelman: Reasonable Disagreement: Mark Tushnet, John Rawls, and a Democratic Point to Constitutionalism 9: Pratap Bhanu Mehta: The Challenge to Liberal Constitutionalism 10: Peter Cane: The Architecture of Constitutionalism 11: Richard Albert: Global Values in National Constitutions 12: Aharon Barak: The Constituent Power and Its Limits 13: Cheryl Saunders: Toward Deeper Dialogue: Constitutional and International Law 14: David Landau: Ancillary Powers of Constitution-Making Bodies 15: Dieter Grimm: Legal Reasoning Matters 16: Catherine O'Regan: The Political Paradox of African Constitutionalism Revisited: Kenya's BBI Case 17: Jeremy Waldron: Rights as the Domain of Weak-Form Review 18: David C. Donald: Common Law and the Liberation of Self-Interest from Regulation 19: Po Jen Yap: Dialogic Judicial Review and First World Autocracies 20: Yaniv Roznai: We the Fourth Branch? The People as an Institution Protecting Democracy 21: Sujit Choudhry: Constitutional Design and Political Parties 22: Vicki C. Jackson: Civic Virtue, Civic Obligation, Knowledge Institutions, and Proconstitutional Actors 23: Bojan BugariÄ: Popular Constitutionalism during Populist Times 24: Cora Chan: Pluralizing Constitutionalism 25: Madhav Khosla: Competitive Populism 26: Erin F. Delaney: Mapping Power Constitutionalism and Its Colonial Legacy 27: Jamal Greene: The Possibilities of Constitutional Tourism 28: Mark Tushnet: Constituent Power in Constitutional Theory, with a Note on Language and Method
Les mer
Madhav Khosla is an Associate Professor of Law at Columbia University. He is interested in the nature and form of constitutions, especially from a comparative and theoretical perspective. Khosla studied political theory at Harvard University, and law at Yale Law School and the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Before joining Columbia Law School, he was a Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows. Khosla's books include India's Founding Moment, which was an Economist Best Book of 2020 and co-winner of the Order of the Coif Book Award 2021. Vicki C. Jackson, Laurence H. Tribe Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, works on comparative constitutional law, U.S. constitutional law, and federal courts. Previously she was Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University. She is the author of Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (2010), coauthor, with Mark Tushnet, of Comparative Constitutional Law (3d ed. 2014), and co-editor, with Yasmin Dawood, of Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? (2022), among other works. Her scholarship concerns knowledge institutions, effective government and constitutionalism; judicial independence and the Supreme Court, free expression, federalism, pro-constitutional representation, proportionality review, equality, unconstitutional amendments, and standing.
Les mer
Provides thorough analysis of the field of comparative constitutional law at a moment of renewed stress and political debate over the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism Examines central questions in global constitutionalism through engagement with the work of Professor Mark Tushnet, whose writings have helped define the study of comparative constitutionalism across a range of subjects and countries for decades Contains essays by the field's leading scholars across jurisdictions
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780198891451
Publisert
2025
Utgiver
Vendor
Oxford University Press
Vekt
848 gr
Høyde
241 mm
Bredde
165 mm
Dybde
32 mm
Aldersnivå
UP, 05
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
464

Volume editor
Khosla Madhav
Jackson Vicki C.

Biographical note

Madhav Khosla is an Associate Professor of Law at Columbia University. He is interested in the nature and form of constitutions, especially from a comparative and theoretical perspective. Khosla studied political theory at Harvard University, and law at Yale Law School and the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Before joining Columbia Law School, he was a Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows. Khosla's books include India's Founding Moment, which was an Economist Best Book of 2020 and co-winner of the Order of the Coif Book Award 2021. Vicki C. Jackson, Laurence H. Tribe Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, works on comparative constitutional law, U.S. constitutional law, and federal courts. Previously she was Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University. She is the author of Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (2010), coauthor, with Mark Tushnet, of Comparative Constitutional Law (3d ed. 2014), and co-editor, with Yasmin Dawood, of Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? (2022), among other works. Her scholarship concerns knowledge institutions, effective government and constitutionalism; judicial independence and the Supreme Court, free expression, federalism, pro-constitutional representation, proportionality review, equality, unconstitutional amendments, and standing.

Relaterte produkter