Introduction1 The (problematic) history of Prevent2 The ‘separatist’ literature on Prevent (and the way forward)3 The temporal ambition of Prevent: stopping people becoming terrorists4 Crossing the temporal gap: vulnerability, extremism and the ordering of identities5 Governing threatening environments: community cohesion and problem institutions6 The Channel project: identifying individuals who are vulnerable to radicalisation7 The identity politics of PreventConclusionIndex

How can potential future terrorists be identified? Forming one of the four pillars of the United Kingdom’s counter-terrorism strategy CONTEST, Prevent seeks to answer, and act on, this question. Occupying a central role in security debates post-9/11, Prevent is concerned with understanding and tackling radicalisation. It carries the promise of early intervention into the lives of those who may be on a pathway to violence. This book offers an innovative account of the Prevent policy, situating it as a novel form of power that has played a central role in the production and the policing of contemporary British identity. Drawing on interviews with those at the heart of Prevent’s development, the book provides readers with an in-depth history and conceptualisation of the policy. The book demonstrates that Prevent is an ambitious new way of thinking about violence that has led to the creation of a radical new role for the state: tackling vulnerability to radicalisation. Foregrounding the analytical relationship between security, identity and temporality in Prevent, this book situates the policy as central to contemporary identity politics in the UK. Detailing the history of the policy, and the concepts and practices that have been developed within Prevent, this book critically engages with the assumptions on which they are based and the forms of power they mobilise.In providing a timely history and analysis of British counter-radicalisation policy, this book will be of interest to students and academics interested in contemporary security policy and domestic responses to the ‘war on terror’.