<p>âBurson uses the censure of the AbbĂ© de Pradesâs thesis by the Sorbonne in 1751 as the impetus to explore the interaction between Catholic theology and the materialism of the radical Enlightenment. . . . Pursuing the facts of the case with a doggedness worthy of Baker Street, Burson is hardly content to let this scandal stand on the merits of its narrative interest.â â<i>New Perspectives on the Eighteenth Century</i></p>
<p>âJeffrey Bursonâs rigorous study of the intellectual, institutional, and, in the end, cultural and political history of âthe Prades affairâ. . . is an important contribution to the history of the French Catholic Church, of the Enlightenment of the <i>philosophes</i>, and of the ancien rĂ©gime. . . . Bursonâs compelling scrutiny of those institutions and intellectual currents, and the light he sheds on their intersection with the tensions and divisions of the Church, and the ancien regime, make this a work of essential value.â â<i>H-France Review</i></p>
<p>âJeffrey D. Burson argues that Prades deserves much more than a footnote or passing mention in the history of the Enlightenment. He sees the condemnation of 1752 as nothing less than a turning point in its whole evolution. . . . To make the hapless abbĂ© the catalyst of the entire later Enlightenment is to make him bear a huge burden, but no future students of the subject will be able to avoid engaging with Bursonâs very impressive scholarly achievement.â â<i>The Catholic Historical Review</i></p>
<p>âJeffrey Burson gives us a detailed account of how Franceâs extreme polarizationâpitting the Enlightenment against the churchâemerged in regard to the so-called de Prades affair, the Sorbonneâs theological facultyâs condemnation of the abbĂ© de Pradesâs thesis in 1751â52. By recovering the historical contingency and multiplicity of factors at work in the de Prades affair, Burson forcefully reminds us that a polarized culture and radical Enlightenment were not foreordained.â â<i>The Journal of Modern History</i></p>
<p>âFar from being the monolithic and supremely secular phenomenon described by such scholars [Ernst Cassirer, Paul Hazard, Peter Gay], the Enlightenment is emerging as a multifaceted movement that was not even uniquely secular. Indeed it is a French, Catholic Enlightenment that Jeffrey D. Burson addresses in this rich study that is the product of wide research.â â<i>Journal of Church and State</i></p>
<p>âBursonâs elegantly written book is to date the most definitive account of a tremendously important theological battle that occurred in Enlightenment Europe, and it evokes thought-provoking reflections on more recent events. He clearly presents the ecclesiastical setting of 18th-century France, guides us safely through complex and highly intricate theological quarrels, and shows their connection to wider trends in the scholarship of the transitional Enlightenment, the radicalization of Enlightenment, the Catholic Enlightenment, and the history of pre-Revolutionary France. This book is a must read for historians and theologians alike.â â<i>Theological Studies</i></p>
<p>âThe intellectual, political, and religious upheavals of eighteenth-century France swept up individuals into maelstroms that carried them to fame or destroyed their lives. Such was the case with an otherwise little known theology student named Jean-Martin de Prades. Jeffrey Burson explores the controversy and political intrigue surrounding Pradesâ thesis, presented to the Sorbonne, as a telling event in the battle for the Gallican Church during the Enlightenment. This volume would serve well as a secondary or recommended text in a graduate level course.â â<i>Teaching History</i></p>
<p>âThis scholarly study re-contextualizes 18th century history in France, and shows how the French Enlightenment grew from the distinctive cultural politics of the French Catholic church.â â<i>The Macon Telegraph</i></p>
<p>"Imagine what might have happened to Roman Catholicism if, in the course of the eighteenth century, the pro-Enlightenment clerics at the Sorbonne had escaped censure and come to dominate the Church's thinking. Burson does a superb job in reminding us about contingency, about the path that might have been taken, and might thereby have avoided the Church's ongoing quarrel with modernity." âMargaret C. Jacob, University of California, Los Angeles</p>
<p>"This is a rich and detailed analysis, based on impressive archival research, that represents the first close study of a key episode in the evolution of the French Enlightenment, one that has not been granted attention for almost fifty years. Through close reading of Prades' doctoral thesis in light of patterns in Catholic apologetics of the first part of the eighteenth century, Burson is able to show that Prades' work represented a synthesis of Locke and Malebranche that was characteristic of Sorbonne apologetics and not a departure from it. His is an exemplary work that provides a newly nuanced perspective on eighteenth-century France and beyond." âSusan Rosa, Northeastern Illinois University</p>
Produktdetaljer
Biographical note
Jeffrey D. Burson is assistant professor of history at Macon State College.
Dale K. Van Kley is an emeritus professor of early modern European history at Ohio State University.