This is the paperback reprint of Paul Russell's 2008 book. In it, Russell challenges the conventional reading of Hume's Treatise with respect to religion. Although it is commonly held that Hume removed religious content from his Treatise. Russell claims that irreligious aims and objectived are fundamental to the Treatise and account for its underlying unity and coherence.

ABBREVIATIONS OF HUME'S WRITINGS USED IN CITATIONS; I. RIDDLES, CRITICS, AND MONSTERS: TEXT AND CONTEXT; II. THE FORM AND FACE OF HUME'S SYSTEM; III. THE NATURE OF HUME'S UNIVERSE; IV. THE ELEMENTS OF VIRTUOUS ATHEISM; V. HUME'S PHILOSOPHY OF IRRELIGION; APPENDIX: CATO'S SPEECH AT THE ORACLE OF AMMON; NOTES; BIBLIOGRAPHY; INDEX

"Paul Russell has given us a marvelously good book.... [He] offers original and compelling accounts of the irreligious implications of central arguments of the Treatise on an impressive range of topics....it should never again be claimed that the Treatise is largely unconcerned with questions of religion." - Don Garrett, Philosophical Review "This book is a triumph and a model for work in the history of philosophy. It offers a powerful reading of the Treatise and of Hume's intentions in writing it, while also correcting common misunderstandings about Hume's place in early modern thought. It deserves to be read by anyone interested in Hume or in early modern philosophy." - Colin Heydt, Journal of the History of Philosophy "Paul Russell's The Riddle of Hume's Treatise is one of the most important contributions to Hume scholarship of recent years, and deserves to be read by all who wish to untangle the complex threads of Hume's masterpiece. It ranks as a permanent and significant achievement." - Peter Millican, British Journal of the History of Philosophy "This is a terrific tome.... Why is this book so important? Quite simply, this is one of the best contextualist studies of Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature ever written. To elaborate a bit, this book provides a unique and fascinating interpretation of the Treatise by relating its structure and content to many of the most influential debates about religion raging at Hume's time.... one of the best books on Hume I have ever read. " - Kevin Meeker, Mind "This book is a triumph and a model for work in the history of philosophy. It offers a powerful reading of the Treatise and of Hume's intentions in writing it, while also correcting common misunderstandings about Hume's place in early modern thought. It deserves to be read by anyone interested in Hume or in early modern philosophy." --Colin Heydt, Journal of the History of Philosophy "The Riddle of Hume's Treatise is a stimulating and provocative piece of scholarship. The central question it poses--how to understand all of the Treatise as part of a single project?--is most certainly a question that still needs to be asked. And Paul Russell's way of answering it, by means of a careful consideration of David Hume's intellectual context, is the only way." --Times Literary Supplement "Paul Russell's The Riddle of Hume's Treatise is an excellent and thought-provoking text that is a pleasure to read.... It deserves to have an important impact not only on Hume research, but on the narrative that drives undergraduate survey courses in the history of early modern philosophy as well." --Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews "Paul Russell has given us a marvelously good book.... [He] offers original and compelling accounts of the irreligious implications of central arguments of the Treatise on an impressive range of topics....it should never again be claimed that the Treatise is largely unconcerned with questions of religion." --Don Garrett, Philosophical Review "[T]his work of great historical erudition and philosophical penetration...is essential reading that will deepen forever our understanding of Hume's philosophical masterpiece." --Don Garrett, Professor of Philosophy, New York University "Russell's...book presents a powerful, comprehensive, and elegantly written case for putting 'irreligion' alongside -- and even above - 'scepticism' and 'naturalism' as a pervasive theme not only of Hume's later work, but also of his Treatise." --Peter Millican, Faculty of Philosophy, Hertford College, Oxford "Paul Russell's lucid and finely-researched book...will enable all of us to read Hume's primary work with fresh understanding, and is a major addition to the scholarly literature." --Terence Penelhum, Professor Emeritus of Religious Studies, University of Calgary "Persuasively argues that irreligion is the main agenda of Hume's Treatise ." --Annette Baier, author of Death and Character: Further Reflections on Hume "A bold and novel approachthe study as a whole has an exceptional merit."--J. D. McNabb, Eighteenth Century Fiction

Selling point: Presents a compelling and original view of Hume's fundamental intentions throughout his greatest and most ambitious philosophical text Selling point: Provides a detailed account of the historical roots of Hume's irreligious philosophical intentions in the wider context of the Radical Enlightenment Selling point: Relevant to the contemporary debate concerning "the new atheism" Selling point: Will be of interest to intellectual historians and philosophers of religion, as well as to historians of early modern philosophy

Paul Russell, Professor in Philosophy, University of British Columbia and Lund University. Paul Russell is Professor in Philosophy at the University of British Columbia and Lund University. His publications include Freedom and Moral Sentiment: Hume's Way of Naturalizing Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 1995); The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion (Oxford University Press, 2008); and editor of The Philosophy of Free Will (Oxford University, 2013).

Selling point: Presents a compelling and original view of Hume's fundamental intentions throughout his greatest and most ambitious philosophical text Selling point: Provides a detailed account of the historical roots of Hume's irreligious philosophical intentions in the wider context of the Radical Enlightenment Selling point: Relevant to the contemporary debate concerning "the new atheism" Selling point: Will be of interest to intellectual historians and philosophers of religion, as well as to historians of early modern philosophy