This book astonishes with its richness, its methodological relevance, and its novelty. We must recommend this book to a readership specializing in the history and philosophy of science because of the variety of approaches grouped together and because of its undeniable programmatic virtue.
Christophe Eckes and translated by Rachel Keith, The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
[T]his book contains many very good things... Several of the contributors to this volume succeed in showing how careful attention to the special meanings attached to "the general" and its cognates can lead to deeper historical insights.
David Rowe, Isis Journal
...this collective book proposes an interesting theoretical framework as well as a collection of studies which are original and important for the history of science, both from a historical and a methodological viewpoint.
Jenny Boucard, Revue d'histoire des sciences (translated from French)
Early mathematicians and scientists seldom discussed their use of generality; the authors expertly examine their work to determine how this concept evolved ... This is an important resource for practitioners in the areas of the history and philosophy of science and mathematics ... Recommended.
CHOICE
The accessibility of the essays is such that not only the specialist, but anyone engaged in the history of science or one of the books historical key figures will benefit from them. Its ideal audience will be composed of historians of science with epistemological interests, and epistemologists wishing to engage with historical matters.
Vincenzo De Risi, Early Science and Medicine