<p><strong>"I find this a most useful volume, in which interesting new insights on an admittedly fairly well-worn subject are presented. Its most important feature is an insistence on the continuity of Plato’s thought, and on the degree to which various different strategies of argument that appear in dialogues of various periods, the Socratic <i>elenchus, hypothesis, </i>and ‘collection and division’, are seen to be compatible and coherent. This goes counter to the views of many modern interpreters of Plato, but I think it is a perspective well worth developing, and it is accomplished with vigour here."</strong> – <i>John Dillon, Trinity College Dublin</i></p>

For Plato, philosophy depends on, or is perhaps even identical with, dialectic. Few will dispute this claim, but there is little agreement as to what Platonic dialectic is. According to a now prevailing view it is a method for inquiry the conception of which changed so radically for Plato that it "had a strong tendency ... to mean ‘the ideal method’, whatever that may be" (Richard Robinson). Most studies of Platonic dialectic accordingly focus on only one aspect of this method that allegedly characterizes one specific period in Plato’s development. This volume offers fresh perspectives on Platonic dialectic. Its 13 chapters present a comprehensive picture of this crucial aspect of Plato’s philosophy and seek to clarify what Plato takes to be proper dialectical procedures. They examine the ways in which these procedures are related to each other and other aspects of his philosophy, such as ethics, psychology, and metaphysics. Collectively, the chapters challenge the now prevailing understanding of Plato’s ideal of method. New Perspectives on Platonic Dialectic will appeal to scholars and advanced students interested in Plato, ancient philosophy, philosophical method, and the history of logic.
Les mer
This volume offers fresh perspectives on Platonic dialectic. Its 13 chapters explore this crucial aspect of Plato’s philosophy and clarify what Plato takes to be proper dialectical procedures. They examine how these procedures are related to each other and other aspects of his philosophy, such as ethics, psychology, and metaphysics.
Les mer
IntroductionJens Kristian Larsen, Vivil Valvik Haraldsen, and Justin Vlasits1. Socrates’ Dialectical use of HypothesisHayden Ausland2. The Dialectician and the Statesman in Plato’s EuthydemusEmily Austin3. Dialectic in Plato’s Parmenides: The Schooling of Young SocratesFrancisco Gonzalez4. Dialectic as a paradigm in the Republic: On the role of reason in the just lifeVivil Valvik Haraldsen5. Elenchus and the Method of Division in the SophistCristina Ionescu6. Using Examples in Philosophical Inquiry: Plato’s Statesman 277d1-278e2 and 285c4-286b2Jens Kristian Larsen7. Examples in the MenoPeter D. Larsen8. Between Variety and Unity. How to deal with Plato´s DialecticWalter Mesch9. Dialectic and the Ability to Orient Ourselves: Republic V-VIIVasilis Politis10. Another Platonic Method: Four genealogical myths about human nature and their philosophical contribution in PlatoCatherine Rowett11. Dialectic in Plato's Sophist: The relation between the question ‘What is being?’ and the question ‘What is there?’Pauline Sabrier12. Dialectic as Philosophical Divination in Plato’s PhaedrusMarilena Vlad13. Plato on the Varieties of KnowledgeJustin Vlasits
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780367622763
Publisert
2022-02-25
Utgiver
Vendor
Routledge
Vekt
566 gr
Høyde
229 mm
Bredde
152 mm
Aldersnivå
UP, 05
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
320

Biographical note

Jens Kristian Larsen is Associate Professor of Philosophy at NTNU, Norway. He specializes in ancient philosophy, in particular Plato, and phenomenology. He recently published "What are Collections and Divisions Good for? A reconsideration of Plato’s Phaedrus (2020) and co-edited the anthology Phenomenological Interpretations of Ancient Philosophy (2021).

Vivil Valvik Haraldsen is ph.d.-candidate in philosophy at the University of Oslo. She has published articles on Plato’s Republic and book chapters on Plato’s Protagoras, Phaedrus, and Apology of Socrates, and has co-edited the anthology Readings of Plato’s Apology of Socrates: Defending the Philosophical Life (2018).

Justin Vlasits is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He specializes in all periods of ancient philosophy, with special emphasis on logic and philosophy of science. He has co-edited Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus with Katja Maria Vogt (2020).