The philosophies of Speculative Realism come in two basic flavors: rationalist and non-rationalist, both of them largely opposed to the poststrucuralist currents that dominated the late 20th-century. While Avanessian and Malik align themselves firmly with the rationalist camp of SR, they also defend poststructuralism in a manner foreign to their fellow rationalists. In so doing, they have assembled a balanced collection of essays that breaks new ground in relating the thought of Althusser, Cavaillès, Lacan, Luhmann, Novalis, Peirce, Whitehead, analytic philosophy, and poststrucuralist feminism to the ideas of the Speculative Realists. This book should quickly become one of the authoritative anthologies in the field.

Graham Harman, Distinguished University Professor, American University in Cairo, Egypt

Clear, incisive, and invariably important, the chapters in this book debate the growing legacy of the new continental realisms for rethinking not just our access to the real, but to subjectivity, politics, and nature. Framed in terms of these realisms' relationship to poststructuralism and other philosophical predecessors, this book refuses the facile "with us or against us" kind of debates often found around discussions of the new realisms, and in this way provides not just insightful essays on this new movement, but ways of rereading major figures of our recent philosophical past. Highly recommended.

Peter Gratton, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada

Rumors of Speculative Realism's demise have been greatly exaggerated; readers of Genealogies of Speculation will be in a position to marvel at the continuing reverberations of the intellectual revolution started by Quentin Meillassoux, Graham Harman, Iain Hamilton Grant, and Ray Brassier.

Jon Cogburn, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Louisiana State University, USA