This volume shows a way to do post-Gettier epistemology. ... In addition to casting light on the nature, purpose and value of epistemic evaluation, purposeful epistemology also facilitates progress on a variety of epistemological issues, such as the relationship between knowledge and practical reasoning, the semantics of knowledge ascriptions and the internalism/externalism debate. This is not to suggest that purposeful epistemology is the only method epistemologists should use. But it is, as the editors point out, 'an important an underappreciated item in the toolbox' (3). I highly recommend this book.

Michael Hannon, Analysis

Epistemic Evaluation aims to explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology. The methodology is to consider the point(s) or purpose(s) of our epistemic evaluations, and to pursue epistemological theory in light of such matters. Call this purposeful epistemology. The idea is that considerations about the point and purpose of epistemic evaluation might fruitfully constrain epistemological theory and yield insights for epistemological reflection. Several contributions to this volume explicitly address this general methodology, or some version of it. Others focus on advancing some application of the methodology rather than on theorizing about it. The papers go on to explore the idea that purposes allow one to understand the conceptual demands on knowing, examine how purposeful epistemology might shed light on the debate between internalist and externalist epistemologies, and further develop the idea of purposeful epistemology.
Les mer
Twelve leading philosophers explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology, which might be called purposeful epistemology. The idea is that considerations about the point and purpose of our concepts (or epistemic norms) promise to yield important insights for epistemological theorizing.
Les mer
PHILOSOPHICAL METHODS AND EVALUATIVE PURPOSES; CONTEXTUALISM AND PRAGMATIC ENCHROACHMENT; DOES KNOWLEDGE ALWAYS REQUIRE REASONS?; THE INTERNALISM/EXTERNALISM DEBATE; EPISTEMIC NORMS AS SOCIAL NORMS
This volume shows a way to do post-Gettier epistemology. ... In addition to casting light on the nature, purpose and value of epistemic evaluation, purposeful epistemology also facilitates progress on a variety of epistemological issues, such as the relationship between knowledge and practical reasoning, the semantics of knowledge ascriptions and the internalism/externalism debate. This is not to suggest that purposeful epistemology is the only method epistemologists should use. But it is, as the editors point out, 'an important an underappreciated item in the toolbox' (3). I highly recommend this book.
Les mer
Written by a team of experts in the field New essays on a key issue in epistemology Will change the direction of future debates
David Henderson is Robert R Chambers Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. John Greco holds the Leonard and Elizabeth Eslick Chair in Philosophy at Saint Louis University.
Les mer
Written by a team of experts in the field New essays on a key issue in epistemology Will change the direction of future debates

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780199642632
Publisert
2015
Utgiver
Vendor
Oxford University Press
Vekt
618 gr
Høyde
240 mm
Bredde
174 mm
Dybde
25 mm
Aldersnivå
UU, UP, 05
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
302

Biographical note

David Henderson is Robert R Chambers Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. John Greco holds the Leonard and Elizabeth Eslick Chair in Philosophy at Saint Louis University.