The authors focus on two contexts, genetic testing and end-of-life care, to locate and demonstrate emerging themes of responsibility, such as self-responsibility, responsibility for kin, and the responsibility of society.

1 Introduction: Engaging in Comparative Bioethics.- 2 Setting the Methodological Scene: The Value of Explication and Pluralization of Moral Grammars.- 3 Applying the Theoretical Tools: Being Affected, Responsibility, and Risk.- 4 Contextualizing the Cultural and Medico-Legal Debate on Adult Genetic Testing.- 5 Making Responsible Life Plans: Cultural Differences in Lay Attitudes in Germany and Israel towards Predictive Genetic Testing for Late-Onset Diseases.- 6 Planning One’s End of Life in an Expert Biomedical Culture.- 7 Lay Attitudes towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel.- 8 Risks and Responsibilities: Making Plans for Life and Death.- 9 Final Conclusion: Disentangling the Micro and the Macro in Bioethics.

“This is a landmark study. Raz and Schicktanz have investigated ethical reasonings by expert and lay people in Israel and Germany about genetic testing and decisions at the end-of-life. In important respects, the widely shared attitudes in Germany and Israel in regard to bioethical issues appear at opposing ends of a moral spectrum. That’s why these countries are interesting to be studied comparatively. By juxtaposing different levels of comparison the authors explore how decisions are made in the context of life plans, not as individual choices, as frequently (and tacitly) assumed in bioethics. It is life-plans which make decisions meaningful. In this conceptual framework we can understand how bioethical decisions refer to cultural grammars. This study is extremely valuable because it also suggests and examines a practical methodology for doing comparative bioethics, which can be applied in other settings. It is also important since it brings reflexivity into bioethical thinking.” (Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Professor of Theory and Ethics in the Biosciences, University of Lübeck) “Contemporary biomedicine increases our possible control over our lives, at its different stages from womb to tomb, turning us all into lay bioethicists having to decide about how we handle genetic risk, or prepare for the end of life.  Written together by a prominent bioethicist and a leading medical sociologist, whose theoretical perspectives complement one another, this extremely interesting book offers a special, empirically grounded POV on how personal, cultural and professional perspectives intertwine in every- day life in Israel and Germany.  The different book chapters beautifully portray how abstract cultural ideas about knowledge, kin-responsibility, citizenship, or the sanctity of life, operate in different localities and personal lives.  The book is highly recommended for all scholars of medical sociology and bioethics, and especially for anyone interested in a thorough comparative analysis in the growing field of empirical bioethics, or in specific issues such as genetic testing and end of life decisions.” (Yael Hashiloni-Dolev, Associate Professor, School of Government and Society, The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, Israel)“Raz and Schicktanz make a greatcontribution to the emerging literature on how the public’s ethical views can be incorporated into bioethical policy. Through empirical examination of the public’s views of the ethics of genetic testing and euthanasia in Germany and Israel, we can see the distance between the views of the public and the experts, and the influence of national context.  This book will not only be of great use to those interested in synthesizing expert and lay opinion in ethics, but to debates about biomedical issues in these two countries.” (John H. Evans, Professor of Sociology, Associate Dean of Social Sciences, University of California, San Diego)

"This is a landmark study. Raz and Schicktanz have investigated ethical reasonings by expert and lay people in Israel and Germany about genetic testing and decisions at the end-of-life. In important respects, the widely shared attitudes in Germany and Israel in regard to bioethical issues appear at opposing ends of a moral spectrum. That's why these countries are interesting to be studied comparatively. By juxtaposing different levels of comparison the authors explore how decisions are made in the context of life plans, not as individual choices, as frequently (and tacitly) assumed in bioethics. It is life-plans which make decisions meaningful. In this conceptual framework we can understand how bioethical decisions refer to cultural grammars. This study is extremely valuable because it also suggests and examines a practical methodology for doing comparative bioethics, which can be applied in other settings. It is also important since it brings reflexivity into bioethical thinking." (Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Professor of Theory and Ethics in the Biosciences, University of Lubeck) "Contemporary biomedicine increases our possible control over our lives, at its different stages from womb to tomb, turning us all into lay bioethicists having to decide about how we handle genetic risk, or prepare for the end of life. Written together by a prominent bioethicist and a leading medical sociologist, whose theoretical perspectives complement one another, this extremely interesting book offers a special, empirically grounded POV on how personal, cultural and professional perspectives intertwine in every- day life in Israel and Germany. The different book chapters beautifully portray how abstract cultural ideas about knowledge, kin-responsibility, citizenship, or the sanctity of life, operate in different localities and personal lives. The book is highly recommended for all scholars of medical sociology and bioethics, and especially for anyone interested in a thorough comparative analysis in the growing field of empirical bioethics, or in specific issues such as genetic testing and end of life decisions." (Yael Hashiloni-Dolev, Associate Professor, School of Government and Society, The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, Israel) "Raz and Schicktanz make a great contribution to the emerging literature on how the public's ethical views can be incorporated into bioethical policy. Through empirical examination of the public's views of the ethics of genetic testing and euthanasia in Germany and Israel, we can see the distance between the views of the public and the experts, and the influence of national context. This book will not only be of great use to those interested in synthesizing expert and lay opinion in ethics, but to debates about biomedical issues in these two countries." (John H. Evans, Professor of Sociology, Associate Dean of Social Sciences, University of California, San Diego)

First book to address bioethics in a broader meaning through a German-Israeli comparison Focuses on lay people and their patients’ perspective of life and death, eugenics and euthanasia Compares bioethical dilemmas of predictive genetic testing and end-of-life issues Provides new methodological and theoretical insights how to do cross-cultural bioethical studies Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras